Instead, my main topics will be on the discourse around and practice of teaching World and US history specifically, teaching generally and more often than not, teaching with technology specifically. It’s this last theme that I’ll be ruminating on today.
I’m going to discuss three key topics that help guide my understanding of how to use technology in the classroom. Technofuturism is a willful belief that technology a) always makes the world better b) has no major costs or trade-offs associated with it and c) is essentially value neutral in terms of who it favors and who it harms. Technofuturism is evident in those who see MOOCs and fully wired campuses as the future of high school and undergraduate teaching. As a teacher/historian I find this really frustrating. Every claim for the MOOC has been made for radio, movies, filmstrips, and television. The central assumption of technofuturists is that knowledge and content are relatively equivalent, that expertise is easily translatable and that the only things worth knowing are right answers. Technofuturism is an ultimately depressing ideology built around the deskilling of teaching and the concentration of power and prestige into a few highly paid individuals via the privatization of education. I have absolutely no desire to take part in manifesting my own technological obsolence, especially when it appears to offer no tangible benefits to my students.
The second term is technophobia. A lot of scholars and teachers, but fewer everyday, are hesitant to use modern technology in the classroom. But few of us are doing so in ways that are helpful to students. Sure your syllabus and assignments are online, but how else are you using modern technology inside and outside the classroom? Technophobia is marked by tendency to reject technology until it’s benefits are so overwhelmingly obvious that the decision to use the technology is a no-brainer. Or, in fancy language, technophobes wait until the adoption of technology appears to be a natural decision because the technology is so thoroughly assimilated that all countervailing discourses have disappeared.
Finally there is technoskepticism. If you didn’t see it coming, this is my preferred platform. Technoskepticism asks a set of questions any particular technology, be it hardware or software or cloud. What does this technology allow me or my students to do that they couldn’t do without it? What costs in terms of dollars and time are associated with this technology? What am I giving up in adopting this technology? Lest you think that I’m using technoskepticism as cover for technophobia here is a partial list of programs and applications I’ve used with students and colleagues in the last few years that have passed this test: wikispaces, Twitter, Smart Ideas, Smart Notebook, Sketch Up, a wide variety of apps that are now under Google Drive, Blogger, Google Earth Tours, GarageBand, and iPhoto.
The point of being a technoskeptic isn’t to say no to technology, it’s to say no to crappy technology and to say yes to good technology.